WiFi Heat Mapping
Blog > It’s Getting Hot in Here! — WiFi Heat Mapping May 16, 2017 |

It’s Getting Hot in Here! — WiFi Heat Mapping

Wireless data is everywhere. It’s virtually impossible for the modern professional to get a rest from receiving or sending emails, photos, videos, reports, spreadsheets. But, this constant on-the-go streaming of data lies at the mercy of the availability and quality of your WiFi network.

There’s only one thing more frustrating than suddenly losing your WIFI connection—not having it in the first place. If you’re ever stuck in the middle of airport wondering how it’s possible in this day and age to suddenly find yourself without the internet of things (IOT) right at your fingertips, please remember that moment—especially if you are in the A/E/C industry. Designers, you can help prevent this frustration from happening! One of the most common reasons for a sudden drop in WiFi access boils down to not enough antenna coverage.

When the reason for poor wireless internet signal is from limited coverage, an on-site survey can be enough to identify where these dead zones live. Of course, adding the needed wireless access points (WAPs) come at a cost—especially if you need to tear up walls, add more cabling, and purchase the devices themselves (commercial WAPs often go for over a thousand bucks a pop!). But, what if I told you there was an easier way to design a network besides putting in a cluster of WAPs and crossing your fingers? What if there was a way to use predictive modeling to figure out how to get the best coverage while using the fewest amount of WAPs possible? Well, there is. At Acentech, I have helped many clients predict WiFi coverage in new and renovated buildings by using predictive modeling software.

When planning a deployment of a wireless network, a predictive modeling survey can plan the right location of the access points. This is an effective way of controlling costs so you have what’s needed at the right time and contractors aren’t suddenly needed back on site after building is completed. Or, in some environments, when money is no object, there’s a tendency to buy more  Some may believe the solution to WIFI coverage is as easy as, “just give me the locations and we’ll add them to the floor plans—we’ll provide network drops based on a predetermined amount of square feet.” If only it were that simple! Building materials, complicated floor plans, and client expectations are all critical factors in how to set up a wireless network. Assuming it all comes down to square footage is how you end up with that problem I mentioned earlier—sitting at a bar, hoping to connect to your email, and praying to the WiFi gods for mercy.

One of the earliest markets to advocate for wireless network design was higher education. After introducing WiFi in residence halls universities tracked how students started to use the data, noticing a drop in wired data  vs. wireless  usage year after year. This data analysis revealed that updates to their residence halls were going to require robust WiFi coverage to keep up with the demands of those living on campus. As those students started to trickle into the workforce, the need for wireless everywhere—not just on college campuses—became more and more apparent to all markets.

The ability for universities to keep up with the surge in wireless demand is no mystery. They knew to plan ahead when it came to WiFi network design—just like in any successful project. The first step is a programmatic meeting with the owner’s IT department. Collecting the programmatic information at the beginning of the design is critical to understanding the needs, capabilities, and expectations of this network. Then, with predictive modeling software, we’re able to model the buildings’ characteristics. This includes one hour walls, two hour walls, mechanical and plumbing chases, concrete walls and foundations, block walls, glass walls, metal doors, wood doors—the list goes on. Each of these possible components to a building can impact WiFi reception within a given room. For instance, two hour rated walls (more gypsum) and metal materials tend to block more signal, while one hour rated walls (less gypsum) and wooden materials tend to be more forgiving. Glass, depending on what type, can impact how far a WiFi signal can reach. An often overlooked aspect to energy efficient glass that uses a thin metallic layer to improve indoor comfort is that it can act as a barrier for WiFi. Due to the properties of this high-tech glass, it has the capability to block wireless signals. Like I said, this process isn’t as simple as square footage and simple math!

When developing wireless heat maps, one must first start with a floor plan. Using this drawing, the building materials for the facility in question are assigned a decibel attenuation value. This value changes in color according to the materials’ abilities to block WiFi signal. For example, thick concrete—a notorious blocker of WiFi signal—would be given a different color than something less substantial, like a demountable wall. These statistical values are then traced on top of the floor plan, and typically looks like this when finished:

Left: A floor plan before it is entered into the wireless heat mapping program
Right: The same floor plan with the building’s infrastructure outlined according to its effects on WiFi signal.

Once the infrastructure is put into place, the fun begins—it is finally time to place the WAPs onto the drawing and give this map some heat! As with any piece of technology, different brands’ devices have different strengths and weaknesses. The specifications of the antennae used within the WAPs selected for this project are then uploaded into the program to ensure accuracy. With this software, we’re able to create a colored heat map illustrating the device’s radio frequency energy, how it travels, and where the loss of signal happens. Where the coverage begins to weaken, we place the next WAP in an engineered, systematic order rather than all the guess work mentioned earlier. WAPs within this program are depicted as numbered circles, as seen in the following image:


Above: A completed wireless heat map in all its glory! Note: the ideal signaling for WiFi should be between -54 and -67dB at the absolute minimum.

As you can see in the above example, the interior of this building is a bright, bluish hue, indicating robust WiFi signaling throughout the facility. Thanks to wireless heat maps, we no longer have to cross our fingers when it comes to WiFi coverage—which frees up our digits to keep scrolling, swiping, and tapping along with the rest of the internet.

Author: Jay L. Epstein

“I find my role at Acentech very gratifying, as I get to meet new architects, build relationships, and keep up with the latest technology. I admire leaders and innovators who…

2 responses to “It’s Getting Hot in Here! — WiFi Heat Mapping”

  1. Mary Elle Wooldridge says:

    It’s incredible how a little foresight and know-how can help to prevent such a common problem.
    It makes sense that universities would be the first sector to tackle this problem – although I graduated seven years ago & it seems like just yesterday I was buying the longest ethernet cable I could find in order to move about my dorm room freely. (Not to mention a landline phone so I could call my parents once a week.)
    I never knew that the more energy efficient glass was so efficient at blocking wi-fi signal! It just goes to show how many factors you have to take into consideration – my hat is off to you!

  2. Kenneth Gartner says:

    Jay, the planning heat map is a helpful visualization for WIFI. There are a few youtube videos with folks using an Android app to walk around and measure the WIFI field strength and then automatically use it to generate a heat map of the actual space. Ah, the wonders of technology!

    I do wonder how you can apply some of the same techniques to wrestle with purpose-built areas that meant to be complete dead-zones for WIFI. As more people become electrosensitive (estimated to 1-3% of the population, exposure often causing pain that is intense and might last for days after a large exposure), being able to have WIFI-FREE (as opposed to ‘free wifi’) zones is going to be as necessary as ‘quiet places’ in the library, ‘scent-free spaces’ at doctors offices, ‘peanut-free area’ at schools, ”ramps’ and elevators alternatives to steps for mobility impaired, and other aspects of accommodation .

    With the obvious corequirement that all such WiFI-FREE spaces be contiguous (so people with this disabling condition can transit from the entrance, to the spots where business is to be conducted without assault from stray signals, even better to be meanwhile isolated from not only the building’s WIFI network, but all of the persons who are toting wireless-hungry devices), this becomes a large challenge for the architect as well as the WIFI planner.

    This kind of accommodation is a pipe dream now and EHS (electrohypersensitive) folks are generally housebound because the public spaces are too polluted for them. I just wanted to bring to your attention that have some ‘dead spots’ in a building are actually extremely welcome to a small percentage of the population. We sometimes forget that not all of the new things are without their downsides and demerits.

    I appreciate how informative these blog articles have been. A real gem.

Leave a Reply

Filter By



33 Moulton Street
Cambridge, MA 02138

617 499 8000

Acentech is an employee-owned company, majority-owned by its employee stock ownership plan (ESOP).